HoustonChronicle.com - NASA limits shuttle viewing areas due to public risk
By MARK CARREAU
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle
RESOURCES
PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY
The Columbia Accident Investigation Board urged NASA to take a look at its public safety policy as a result of the Feb. 1, 2003, breakup of the shuttle Columbia that killed seven astronauts.
• Potentially worse: Columbia disintegrated over East Texas and Louisiana, but nobody was hurt on the ground by the 84,000 pounds of debris and toxic rocket propellants.
• Grim odds: Investigators estimate the chance of at least one serious public injury at between 9 percent and 24 percent.
NASA has adopted new safety measures intended to lower the risk to the public during launch and landing of the space shuttle when missions resume in mid-May, agency officials said Tuesday.
One of the changes, still being worked out, will restrict public access to the closest viewing sites at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
Also under the revision, a shuttle with critical damage or an impaired flight control system would be diverted to an emergency runway at White Sands, N.M. The Florida facility will continue to serve as the shuttle's primary landing site.
"Philosophically, what we are trying to do is ensure we do not add significantly to the overall risk the public already accepts in their daily lives," said Bryan O'Connor, the agency's chief of safety and mission assurance.
In 113 previous flights of the shuttle that date back to 1981, White Sands has served as a landing site only once, in 1982.
Mission Control intends to rely on Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., as its primary backup to Kennedy and would look to a landing at the West Coast site if a shuttle crew faced weather hazards in Florida and was running low on air, food and water.
But the space agency believes the remote New Mexico site would pose the lowest public risk in an emergency.
Already used as a test range by the military for other hazardous activities, White Sands is much less populous than the Los Angeles basin adjacent to Edwards and the Central Florida region near Kennedy.
O'Connor and the other officials who joined him were less certain of how the new policy would affect spectators who like to gather in Florida to witness shuttle launches.
"I wouldn't characterize it as drastic," Allard Beutel, a space agency spokesman said after the briefing.
O'Connor said NASA estimates it can accommodate 20,000 to 25,000 spectators on the sprawling Florida launch complex.
However, those allowed within three miles of the launch pad, the closest public viewing site, likely will be restricted.
Experts will complete safety plans in a few weeks.
Shuttle Discovery and a crew of seven is to lift off on the first post-Columbia mission on May 15.
Bill Parsons, NASA's shuttle program manager, said the agency may be a month away from determining whether the May 15 launch target is achievable.
If Discovery cannot lift off by June 3, shuttle managers will reschedule the mission for a July 12 launch.
2005-03-22
2005-03-16
Lucky Larry Silverstein's Second Bonanza
Court verdict: WTC terror attacks were two occurrences for insurance purposes: 07 December 2004 '
Ground Zero developer Larry Silverstein to collect money from nine insurers
Court verdict: WTC terror attacks were two occurrences for insurance purposes
A New York court ruled that the World Trade Center terrorist attacks were two separate event, meaning leaseholder Larry Silverstein stands to collect up to $2.2 billion from nine insurers. 'I am thrilled with today's victory. But this is a win for all New Yorkers,' Silverstein said.
Allianz AG, Europe's largest insurer, disappointed by the verdict -- which means Larry Silverstein could get twice as much money from nine insurers of the World Trade Center. �The decision is not in Allianz's favor. We clearly see the impact on the company's balance sheet as manageable�, Lucio di Geronimo, an analyst at HVB Group in Munich, said.
Silverstein promised that the trade center complex, including 10 million square feet of office space and memorial buildings, would be to reconstructed in the next decade.The developer also said that the rebuilding of 10 million square feet offices would cost about $7.5 billion."
Court verdict: WTC terror attacks were two occurrences for insurance purposes
A New York court ruled that the World Trade Center terrorist attacks were two separate event, meaning leaseholder Larry Silverstein stands to collect up to $2.2 billion from nine insurers. 'I am thrilled with today's victory. But this is a win for all New Yorkers,' Silverstein said.
Allianz AG, Europe's largest insurer, disappointed by the verdict -- which means Larry Silverstein could get twice as much money from nine insurers of the World Trade Center. �The decision is not in Allianz's favor. We clearly see the impact on the company's balance sheet as manageable�, Lucio di Geronimo, an analyst at HVB Group in Munich, said.
Silverstein promised that the trade center complex, including 10 million square feet of office space and memorial buildings, would be to reconstructed in the next decade.The developer also said that the rebuilding of 10 million square feet offices would cost about $7.5 billion."
2005-02-24
Pillaging Iraq
BELLACIAO - Paul Bremer and the Looting of Iraq - Collective Bellaciao
I have never met Paul Bremer. Yet like a criminal investigator I have stalked him across Iraq for the past 2-1/2 years. In Baghdad I kept my distance from the "Coalition Provisional Authority." I immediately felt this organization would be a disaster, and I was right.
Since his return to the United States last June Bremer has tried to disassociate himself from his own record. Yet there is now no doubt that Iraq was systematically looted under Bremer’s administration. Like a piano player in a frontier saloon, Bremer claims to be ignorant of what was going on in the hotel rooms above. But he cannot escape responsibility and liability so easily.
President Bush stated that we would treat Iraqi oil money as a solemn trust to be disbursed solely for the benefit of the Iraqi people. Now nine billion dollars of Iraqi funds are missing. Over forty cents ($.40) of every Iraqi dollar supervised by the United States is unaccounted for.
Every large organization maintains "petty cash" accounts. Occasionally a "bookkeeper” will embezzle funds, from a bank. MCI officials are on trial in New York for inflating their financial records by more than $10 billion. But $9 billion missing? This has to be the greatest robbery in history. And it took place under Bremer’s nose.
In a little-noticed lawsuit pending in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia a bogus operation calling itself "Custer Battles LLC" and managed by a former Republican candidate for congress was paid millions of dollars in cash. Again Bremer claims to be ignorant of this defalcation as well.
Bremer says "Western" accounting methods were impossible in Iraq because it was a war zone. When Bremer arrived in May 2003 Baghdad was quiet. President Bush had just proclaimed "Mission Accomplished," the roads were safe and violence was at a minimum.
The fact that the United States has lost forty cents of every Iraqi dollar Bremer administered is a disgrace. Why did President Bush award Bremer a "Medal of Freedom" for this mass incompetence and corruption? Where is the missing money? The magnitude of the defalcated funds staggers. Nine billion dollars? Millions of dollars paid out in cash to suspect characters?
And now the United States Government claims in a federal court it needs more than a month to explain how Bremer came to me in Iraq and who conferred authority on him. How can Attorney General Gonzales plead ignorance? Wasn’t Mr. Gonzales--who worked in the White House--watching TV or reading the newspapers? Bremer was appointed by the United States; he was Rumsfeld’s man, the neo-con "man on a wedding cake" as I characterized him in my reporting from Baghdad. How can federal attorneys now plead ignorance of our role in Iraq, and seek to shuffle the blame on Britain, Poland and maybe Tonga as well? Lawyers sometimes make their clients look like asses; this is one of those occasions.
President Bush must take decisive action to revoke Bremer’s medal, and to demand an independent counsel (special prosecutor) or he will find the United States increasingly isolated as a predatory and unscrupulous nation of thieves who looted Iraq while mouthing pious platitudes about trust and responsibility. The credibility of our nation has been undermined by Bremer; he has disgraced the United States.
Iraq has been boldly and blatantly looted. Who is responsible? Bremer, and who else? "Custer Battles" is making a "last stand" in a federal court in Virginia. What about Bremer’s last stand? He destroyed Iraq. Now he is under the gun. It is a shameful episode in our history, and it will only lead to more embarrassment and more disasters. Attorney General Gonzales, President Bush, are you listening?
I have never met Paul Bremer. Yet like a criminal investigator I have stalked him across Iraq for the past 2-1/2 years. In Baghdad I kept my distance from the "Coalition Provisional Authority." I immediately felt this organization would be a disaster, and I was right.
Since his return to the United States last June Bremer has tried to disassociate himself from his own record. Yet there is now no doubt that Iraq was systematically looted under Bremer’s administration. Like a piano player in a frontier saloon, Bremer claims to be ignorant of what was going on in the hotel rooms above. But he cannot escape responsibility and liability so easily.
President Bush stated that we would treat Iraqi oil money as a solemn trust to be disbursed solely for the benefit of the Iraqi people. Now nine billion dollars of Iraqi funds are missing. Over forty cents ($.40) of every Iraqi dollar supervised by the United States is unaccounted for.
Every large organization maintains "petty cash" accounts. Occasionally a "bookkeeper” will embezzle funds, from a bank. MCI officials are on trial in New York for inflating their financial records by more than $10 billion. But $9 billion missing? This has to be the greatest robbery in history. And it took place under Bremer’s nose.
In a little-noticed lawsuit pending in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia a bogus operation calling itself "Custer Battles LLC" and managed by a former Republican candidate for congress was paid millions of dollars in cash. Again Bremer claims to be ignorant of this defalcation as well.
Bremer says "Western" accounting methods were impossible in Iraq because it was a war zone. When Bremer arrived in May 2003 Baghdad was quiet. President Bush had just proclaimed "Mission Accomplished," the roads were safe and violence was at a minimum.
The fact that the United States has lost forty cents of every Iraqi dollar Bremer administered is a disgrace. Why did President Bush award Bremer a "Medal of Freedom" for this mass incompetence and corruption? Where is the missing money? The magnitude of the defalcated funds staggers. Nine billion dollars? Millions of dollars paid out in cash to suspect characters?
And now the United States Government claims in a federal court it needs more than a month to explain how Bremer came to me in Iraq and who conferred authority on him. How can Attorney General Gonzales plead ignorance? Wasn’t Mr. Gonzales--who worked in the White House--watching TV or reading the newspapers? Bremer was appointed by the United States; he was Rumsfeld’s man, the neo-con "man on a wedding cake" as I characterized him in my reporting from Baghdad. How can federal attorneys now plead ignorance of our role in Iraq, and seek to shuffle the blame on Britain, Poland and maybe Tonga as well? Lawyers sometimes make their clients look like asses; this is one of those occasions.
President Bush must take decisive action to revoke Bremer’s medal, and to demand an independent counsel (special prosecutor) or he will find the United States increasingly isolated as a predatory and unscrupulous nation of thieves who looted Iraq while mouthing pious platitudes about trust and responsibility. The credibility of our nation has been undermined by Bremer; he has disgraced the United States.
Iraq has been boldly and blatantly looted. Who is responsible? Bremer, and who else? "Custer Battles" is making a "last stand" in a federal court in Virginia. What about Bremer’s last stand? He destroyed Iraq. Now he is under the gun. It is a shameful episode in our history, and it will only lead to more embarrassment and more disasters. Attorney General Gonzales, President Bush, are you listening?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)